Tagged: The Piper

Aug 16

The Naked Truth!

With all the drama that has afflicted many of those who have done so, one would think the message may have got out there by now but apparently not. I’m talking about posting pics of yourself in the altogether online and believing no harm will come to you as a result.

Trust me, it can find you all right and if it does, it could get really nasty and turn your life upside down.

Like the “sextortion” racket currently targeting people, a high percentage of whom are young men, via dating apps and social networking sites. What happens is this; people make a “connection” with another person and it appears all very nice. Before long, however, the person at the other end suggests a move to a private chat room where they can continue their conversation. Once there, they will quickly manage to bring the chat around to requesting some naked images, either pics or videos. Now, one would think that this request should present as a Big Red Flag, warning of the strong possibility that something’s not quite right, but the number of people missing the flag completely is staggering, and the numbers are growing.

So what is it about a request from a complete stranger, asking for intimate images, that’s failing to alert people? Seriously, there is only one kind of person who does this, and you’ve just met one of them!

In the case of sextortion, once those images have been uploaded and captured at the other end, the sender will almost immediately begin to receive threats demanding either money, more images or both, with a warning that failure to comply will result in your naked pics being uploaded to the Internet. And it’s unlikely to stop should you pay up. As with any form of blackmail, it will go on and on.

This is the ugly reality of sending naked pics of yourself to anyone, or in allowing someone to take intimate pics or video footage of you. Regardless of who has snapped them or has possession of them, there are no guarantees that you images won’t end up being shared publicly via the Internet. It’s what happens. I guess the best filter here is to ask yourself if you would be okay with your family, your friends, your boss or you workmates, plus thousands of complete strangers seeing them. If the answer is “not on your life!” then don’t get your gear off in front of a lens. Just don’t do it.

Sextortion is one of the nastier ones doing the rounds at the moment and it is also a crime. If you have been caught by a sextorion racket, you need to report it to the authorities. But if not, then heed this as a warning. Do not give anyone access to naked images of yourself. Anyone at all, because you have no guarantee of privacy and no comeback if you willingly pose and it gets out there. Sextortion is possibly as bad as it can get.

You do not want to go there.

0
comments

Dec 29

The Barbie Myth

Once upon a time there was a beautiful teenage doll called Barbie. She was popular, she had style and lots of wonderful clothes and accessories. Over time she could pretty much do anything, even suntan! My older sister had a Barbie and I would have killed for one. In fact, I believe I “killed” my Cindy doll in the hope she would be replaced, come the next birthday or Christmas, with a Barbie. But …(sigh)…didn’t happen.

Barbie became an icon, the most popular doll on the market, and little girls the world over spent many wonderful years playing with their Barbie dolls. When I could manage to get a hold of her, I really enjoyed playing with my sister’s! As dolls went, she was a standout.

Now all of this should have a happy ending, right? Well no, unfortunately Barbie became the target of a minority of experts (and I use the term very loosely) who have vilified the Barbie doll, claiming she is a very bad influence on little girls and the result has been the destruction of this glamorous icon to pacify them. It’s an outrage really, because Barbie was in a class of her own, there was no comparison and consecutive teenage dolls never really came up to scratch. They just lacked that It factor.

The negative press began back in the 90s when the first of the minority “experts” decided Barbie’s glamour-puss looks were detrimental to every little girls’ personal development; leading them to such nasties as bulimia, anorexia and body issues in general as they strived to look like their Barbie dolls and would then clock up hours on the analyst’s couch when they didn’t! Really? The generations of little girls who played with Barbie, grew up and didn’t fall into these categories counted for nothing? Apparently not, and that’s an awful lot to dump on a doll, I think. Fortunately no one was really listening back then and Barbie continued to flourish. And then, in 2017, Mattel caved to the minority and Barbie has been remodelled to better represent “real” women. Ken’s had a makeover too, I think. But why???

A documentary I watched not too long ago, which focused on the perceived influence of the Barbie doll, had the narrator trying very hard to get a handful of little girls to express what she wanted to hear. When it didn’t happen she eventually asked outright if they wanted to look just like Barbie when they grew up?  Th little girls looked at her askance and then one piped up with “But she’s a doll!” and that summed the whole debate up for me. The generations of healthy women who played with Barbie as children also support my belief that the “experts” need to just shut up and go away!

Anyway, Barbie now comes in all shapes and sizes so you would think her detractors would be happy, wouldn’t you? They’re not though, if the antics of the woman checking a series of graphs and making comparisons in ominous tones is anything to go by. According to her, even podgy Barbie is “in fact” below the realistic standard weight ratio, whatever that is. You’ve got to be kidding me. It’s a doll! Personally, I think the new “real shape/weight/look” Barbies are hideous!

The whole concept of the doll has been lost and it’s tragic.

But seriously… It’s A Doll!

 

0
comments

Dec 15

When On-Trend is Completely Off!

 

Womanspreading, or the “power stance” as it is also known, is apparently a thing now. Don’t know what that is? Lucky you! But on the off-chance that you do want to know, Womanspreading is the female response to Manspreading, where women sit with their legs spread, like men do when seated. It is supposedly designed to empower women. Right.

Naturally it has become a celebrity thingy, with a number of celebrity females opting to spread, shoot and then post their crotch-in-your-face image on social media, and why am I not surprised? Because some of the stupidest trends come out of the celebrity circuit and this one would have to be right up there I think.

But let’s look at why men sit with their legs apart. Mainly it’s a matter of comfort. Men are not physically designed to sit with their legs crossed or close together. It’s just not comfortable. In other cases, the male leg spread is a subconscious display, especially amongst alpha types, who will sit back with arms apart and legs spread in a display of male dominance in a male group and is also not an uncommon response in the presence of a female the alpha may find attractive. The key word here though, is subconscious. It’s a subliminal message of sorts.

In relation to women though, the leg spread is entirely unnecessary but fans of this idiocy claim it is designed to empower women. Really? And how exactly does it do that? You see, women sitting with their legs spread also send a subliminal message, but probably not the one the current slaves to this trend have in mind. As opposed to saying “Hi! I am an Empowered Woman!” to every male within eyeshot, the message going out can easily be misconstrued.  Like it or no, that’s the message many men will get from a display of Womanspreading. It’s not a good look and let’s face it, it has connotations. There are so many better ways for women to put themselves out there, to showcase themselves and to empower themselves.

Personally speaking, I don’t think the women trending this have really thought it through. Like, they are not only adopting this pose, they are posting images of themselves doing it on social media and we all know what happens with controversial images of ourselves posted online, don’t we? Why, they come back to bite us, often sooner rather than later, because they will end up shared all over the place. Then, try as you might to find someone else to blame, you will end up having to wear it all on your own. Hard to present as a victim when you have done it all by yourself.

I’m going to assume here that not too many non-celebrity women will follow this trend because, as I said, it has connotations, but there are enough sheep out there to have it do the rounds for a little while. I’m guessing though that it may turn out to be one of those five minute wonders, like the short skirt with no knickers trend, which turned out to be just a flash in the pan. At least Womanspreading requires one to wear clothes. Well, for the moment anyway.

Still a cheap shot though

0
comments

Nov 17

The Citizenship Conversation

It hasn’t been going very well for our Aussie politicians, has it? That’s because of the big question mark hovering over the “Aussie” bit as many of them are apparently discovering they may not be as Australian as they first thought! Yes, I know, not being aware of one’s citizenship status seems like a bit of a stretch to me too but those of them caught up in the mess are looking a tad shell-shocked, which leads me to believe that it’s entirely possible that a foreign or dual citizenship issue hadn’t occurred to them when they entered the Australian political arena.

If born here, and one’s birth registered here, it is entirely likely that one would assume that one was Australian, right? Regardless of where one’s parents and/or grandparents came from, yes? Well that’s what I would think too but it is not unheard of for parents to also register their child as a citizen of the country of their own birth as well, thus granting them dual citizenship or even full citizenship in some cases, with the country of their parents’ birth. That was the case with a couple I knew many years ago; Mum was Australian, Dad American but they were living in Australia when Daughter Number Two was born. They had her registered as an American citizen. Oh well, seems she didn’t enter politics so no problem.

It’s also possible that parents, who have done the dual or foreign citizenship thingy with their offspring, may not have told them about it, leaving the child/children to discover it for themselves somewhere down the track, like when they decide to enter politics. One has to be an Australian citizen to enter politics in Australia,  but if all the Australian politicians caught up in this mess are to be believed, none of them had the foggiest idea. Seems the citizenship conversation was one they never had with their parents. But why would they  even think to ask? As in “Hey Mum, am I an Aussie citizen?”

“Well, funny you should ask…because you’re actually not. You see, if you’d been born a girl, we would have just named you after Great Grandma Zanillya, which would have been easier I suppose, but when you turned out to be a boy we decided to have you made a citizen of that tiny Eastern European country, which we’ve never been able to pronounce, that she came from instead. It was a respectful acknowledgement thing, you know? And she was so excited. At least we think she was…she didn’t speak any English so it was a bit hard to tell.”

“You had me made a citizen of a country you can’t even pronounce??!”

“I can spell it though, hang on while I write it down for you.”

Nope, it’s highly unlikely that someone who was born and bred in one country would think to question whether they were possibly a citizen of another. It’s just not something that would normally come to mind.

Meanwhile in Australia, political careers are plummeting as more and more of those in office are being found to be there “illegally” because despite their being born here, they have some vague connection to a foreign country via parents having been born overseas and/or being eligible for dual citizenship as a result. At last one of them apparently gained foreign citizenship via his mother so he’s Italian or something now, and he didn’t even know it! Well that’s what he claims anyway.

Makes you wonder, doesn’t it? I’m fairly certain I’m an Australian citizen but I may not be, despite the fact that I was born here, as were my parents and grandparents.

Seems that doesn’t mean a thing anymore…

 

 

 

0
comments

Nov 10

Pre-schooler Prepping??!

If you have opted to become a tutor specialising in preparing pre-schoolers for Kindergarten, you are probably going to make a lot of money via the increase in parents paying to have their four-year-olds tutored in literacy and numeracy in an effort to give them the upper hand upon starting school.  All because of an assessment which is not a test.

Believe it or not, children actually learn a lot from play, which is why it is so important and at three and four years of age, children shouldn’t be constrained by formal tutoring. They probably don’t even want to be, because timeslots of formal learning really cut into play time and if given the chance to choose between the two, they will opt for play every time. Nevertheless, parents are pushing ahead with “lessons” for their littlies to get them “academically prepared” for school, hence the rise in enrolments at tutoring colleges for programs aimed at prepping pre-schoolers…for Kindergarten! Apparently a lot of it has to do with a compulsory (in all state schools and some private schools) assessment before they enter Kindergarten, which is part of the Best Start program designed to identify each child’s literacy and numeracy skills. Left to their own devices, most pre-kindies would score around the same here I think, the exceptions being the exceptionally bright, but the playing field will no longer be level now, let alone accurate, because those not shoved into tutoring naturally won’t score quite as well as the child tutored to within an inch of its life, which will probably cause them to be assessed unfairly. A spokesperson for the NSW Department of Education said however that the Best Start program was not a test and that children did not need tutoring to prepare for it and that tutoring makes it a lot more difficult for teachers to get an accurate snapshot of a child’s genuine numeracy and literacy skills.

But how much pressure should we put on pre-schoolers anyway? We are talking little kids here who still place more value on play than structured learning, something that will begin proper when they enter school and will continue for the next 10 to 12 years where they will learn to read, write, do maths, history, geography and the sciences. Years of study and cramming and exams ahead of them and if they go on to university you can add around another two to four years of that! And it will all begin in Kindergarten!

So why not just let them have those first four years to enjoy being little kids spending their days in play?

Sure, we would all like to see our children do well academically and helping them along at their own pace is a fine idea, but there is a big difference between assisting them at their own pace and compelled learning being imposed way too early; show me a four-year-old who has been forced into academic tutoring and I’ll show you a little soul who doesn’t know the difference between a mathematical problem and a hopscotch grid. Okay, maybe that’s a tad extreme but the point I’m making is that at pre-school age, they will learn far more from play than from structured tutoring. They will enjoy it more because the pressure won’t be there. Also, tutoring can send the wrong message to those kiddies who haven’t been, as in maybe they are not smart enough, and in a Kindy classroom of tutored children, those who did not take part in pre-school tutoring programs may be made to feel less than their peers. This is really unfair.

But there are always going to be parents pushing to get the advantage no matter how negatively it may impact on their children which makes me wonder who they are really doing it for?

Themselves, I think…

0
comments

Oct 27

The Gift of the Jab

Misinformation is a problem at the best of times, and unfortunately, the Internet is full of it. People with no solid background in science, medicine, or healthcare are some of the worst offenders when it comes to misinformation because they often manage to package themselves as “qualified” or “professional” when they actually aren’t either and this is a real problem because they inevitably attract followers via those looking for answers when things go wrong.

They are kind of like cult leaders, I think,  with an over generous dollop of pot-stirrer (to attract controversy) thrown in for good measure and are very good at roping in the type of people who will readily believe whatever they read or hear and in the case of parents looking for something to blame when their child is not born perfectly healthy…well they’re just fodder for these self-styled “professionals”

Top of the list right now are the anti-vaccers. On the off chance you don’t know who they are, anti-vaccers are are loudly vocal group advocating that parents forgo vaccinations in the interests of their children’s health. They have proclaimed that vaccinations are full of poisonous toxins and are to blame for such conditions as asthma, schizophrenia, autism and eczema and that’s just for starters. No doubt there are other health issues out there just waiting to be labelled as vaccine-induced too but those I have mentioned above are the most common baddies at the moment. The anti-vaccine advocates would have you believe that it is actually good for children to contract nasty preventable diseases because, basically, they are “non-threatening” illnesses and once the child recovers they will have a natural immunity. Ri-ight, except that “recovers” is the debatable word here.

Let’s do a whip-around of those “non-threatening” diseases, shall we? We’ll start with Measles, Mumps and Chickenpox. Yes, children have caught these and most of them recovered, but measles and chickenpox can leave pockmark scars that don’t go away. Mumps can leave boys sterile. Adults who are unfortunate enough to contract these diseases are a lot sicker than if they had had the diseases as children. Adult males who contract mumps are more highly likely to end up sterile.

Next on the list is Diphtheria. This highly contagious bacterial disease attacks and causes inflammation of the mucus membranes. It also causes the formation of false membranes in the throat, which seriously hinders breathing and swallowing, as well as potentially fatal heart and nerve damage via the bacterial toxins in the bloodstream. Tetanus is another bacterial nasty which causes severe and painful spasms and rigidity of the voluntary muscles and locks the jaw. There is no cure. Tuberculosis (TB, Consumption) is a bacterial infection that especially infects the lungs. Symptoms are fever, coughing fits that get more severe as the disease progresses and death is usually caused by eventual haemorrhage. The most common form, Pulmonary Tuberculosis, has caused millions of deaths. And let’s not forget Poliomyelitis (Polio). This infectious viral disease attacks the central nervous system, causing paralysis. Those making a recovery are left crippled. Many ended up in an iron lung, a big metal device which provided prolonged artificial respiration. Before vaccination, hospitals had a lot of these.  And then there’s Whooping Cough, a highly contagious bacterial disease characterised by compulsive coughing. Also know as Pertussis, it is usually fatal in babies and toddlers. Seriously, who would do nothing to prevent their child catching one of these when the means to prevention is readily available???

The advent of vaccination means these diseases have, thankfully, all but disappeared in developed countries. The bacteria that causes them is still present in our world but the controlled dose of lab-grown versions of them means we can be safely “infected” but not catch the disease, let alone die from it! But vaccination is most effective when everyone gets it and that’s where those refusing to vaccinate their children are causing so much damage. A vaccinated child coming into close proximity with an unvaccinated one who is sick can still contract the disease and can then pass it on to others, like babies not yet old enough to have begun the vaccination program, those with other health issues and the aged and it is often fatal for them.

In an extreme effort to promote non-vaccination, anti-vaccers have propagated a rabid campaign of misinformation which has caused a lot of confusion for some parents who naturally want to do the best by their children. This is very unfair. Interestingly, many of the anti-vaccination supporters soon lost their fervour when the Australian Government imposed welfare cuts and the non-payment of other government assistance to those refusing to vaccinate their children. Funny that! But with the reintroduction of many of these nasty but preventable diseases, due to a stubborn and misguided group of individuals opting out of vaccinating, some hefty action needed to be taken  and withholding the government handouts these people enjoy was probably one of the most effective actions it could have taken.

Because money talks.

0
comments

Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.