Tagged: humour

Dec 29

The Barbie Myth

Once upon a time there was a beautiful teenage doll called Barbie. She was popular, she had style and lots of wonderful clothes and accessories. Over time she could pretty much do anything, even suntan! My older sister had a Barbie and I would have killed for one. In fact, I believe I “killed” my Cindy doll in the hope she would be replaced, come the next birthday or Christmas, with a Barbie. But …(sigh)…didn’t happen.

Barbie became an icon, the most popular doll on the market, and little girls the world over spent many wonderful years playing with their Barbie dolls. When I could manage to get a hold of her, I really enjoyed playing with my sister’s! As dolls went, she was a standout.

Now all of this should have a happy ending, right? Well no, unfortunately Barbie became the target of a minority of experts (and I use the term very loosely) who have vilified the Barbie doll, claiming she is a very bad influence on little girls and the result has been the destruction of this glamorous icon to pacify them. It’s an outrage really, because Barbie was in a class of her own, there was no comparison and consecutive teenage dolls never really came up to scratch. They just lacked that It factor.

The negative press began back in the 90s when the first of the minority “experts” decided Barbie’s glamour-puss looks were detrimental to every little girls’ personal development; leading them to such nasties as bulimia, anorexia and body issues in general as they strived to look like their Barbie dolls and would then clock up hours on the analyst’s couch when they didn’t! Really? The generations of little girls who played with Barbie, grew up and didn’t fall into these categories counted for nothing? Apparently not, and that’s an awful lot to dump on a doll, I think. Fortunately no one was really listening back then and Barbie continued to flourish. And then, in 2017, Mattel caved to the minority and Barbie has been remodelled to better represent “real” women. Ken’s had a makeover too, I think. But why???

A documentary I watched not too long ago, which focused on the perceived influence of the Barbie doll, had the narrator trying very hard to get a handful of little girls to express what she wanted to hear. When it didn’t happen she eventually asked outright if they wanted to look just like Barbie when they grew up?  Th little girls looked at her askance and then one piped up with “But she’s a doll!” and that summed the whole debate up for me. The generations of healthy women who played with Barbie as children also support my belief that the “experts” need to just shut up and go away!

Anyway, Barbie now comes in all shapes and sizes so you would think her detractors would be happy, wouldn’t you? They’re not though, if the antics of the woman checking a series of graphs and making comparisons in ominous tones is anything to go by. According to her, even podgy Barbie is “in fact” below the realistic standard weight ratio, whatever that is. You’ve got to be kidding me. It’s a doll! Personally, I think the new “real shape/weight/look” Barbies are hideous!

The whole concept of the doll has been lost and it’s tragic.

But seriously… It’s A Doll!

 

0
comments

Nov 17

The Citizenship Conversation

It hasn’t been going very well for our Aussie politicians, has it? That’s because of the big question mark hovering over the “Aussie” bit as many of them are apparently discovering they may not be as Australian as they first thought! Yes, I know, not being aware of one’s citizenship status seems like a bit of a stretch to me too but those of them caught up in the mess are looking a tad shell-shocked, which leads me to believe that it’s entirely possible that a foreign or dual citizenship issue hadn’t occurred to them when they entered the Australian political arena.

If born here, and one’s birth registered here, it is entirely likely that one would assume that one was Australian, right? Regardless of where one’s parents and/or grandparents came from, yes? Well that’s what I would think too but it is not unheard of for parents to also register their child as a citizen of the country of their own birth as well, thus granting them dual citizenship or even full citizenship in some cases, with the country of their parents’ birth. That was the case with a couple I knew many years ago; Mum was Australian, Dad American but they were living in Australia when Daughter Number Two was born. They had her registered as an American citizen. Oh well, seems she didn’t enter politics so no problem.

It’s also possible that parents, who have done the dual or foreign citizenship thingy with their offspring, may not have told them about it, leaving the child/children to discover it for themselves somewhere down the track, like when they decide to enter politics. One has to be an Australian citizen to enter politics in Australia,  but if all the Australian politicians caught up in this mess are to be believed, none of them had the foggiest idea. Seems the citizenship conversation was one they never had with their parents. But why would they  even think to ask? As in “Hey Mum, am I an Aussie citizen?”

“Well, funny you should ask…because you’re actually not. You see, if you’d been born a girl, we would have just named you after Great Grandma Zanillya, which would have been easier I suppose, but when you turned out to be a boy we decided to have you made a citizen of that tiny Eastern European country, which we’ve never been able to pronounce, that she came from instead. It was a respectful acknowledgement thing, you know? And she was so excited. At least we think she was…she didn’t speak any English so it was a bit hard to tell.”

“You had me made a citizen of a country you can’t even pronounce??!”

“I can spell it though, hang on while I write it down for you.”

Nope, it’s highly unlikely that someone who was born and bred in one country would think to question whether they were possibly a citizen of another. It’s just not something that would normally come to mind.

Meanwhile in Australia, political careers are plummeting as more and more of those in office are being found to be there “illegally” because despite their being born here, they have some vague connection to a foreign country via parents having been born overseas and/or being eligible for dual citizenship as a result. At last one of them apparently gained foreign citizenship via his mother so he’s Italian or something now, and he didn’t even know it! Well that’s what he claims anyway.

Makes you wonder, doesn’t it? I’m fairly certain I’m an Australian citizen but I may not be, despite the fact that I was born here, as were my parents and grandparents.

Seems that doesn’t mean a thing anymore…

 

 

 

0
comments

Oct 27

The Gift of the Jab

Misinformation is a problem at the best of times, and unfortunately, the Internet is full of it. People with no solid background in science, medicine, or healthcare are some of the worst offenders when it comes to misinformation because they often manage to package themselves as “qualified” or “professional” when they actually aren’t either and this is a real problem because they inevitably attract followers via those looking for answers when things go wrong.

They are kind of like cult leaders, I think,  with an over generous dollop of pot-stirrer (to attract controversy) thrown in for good measure and are very good at roping in the type of people who will readily believe whatever they read or hear and in the case of parents looking for something to blame when their child is not born perfectly healthy…well they’re just fodder for these self-styled “professionals”

Top of the list right now are the anti-vaccers. On the off chance you don’t know who they are, anti-vaccers are are loudly vocal group advocating that parents forgo vaccinations in the interests of their children’s health. They have proclaimed that vaccinations are full of poisonous toxins and are to blame for such conditions as asthma, schizophrenia, autism and eczema and that’s just for starters. No doubt there are other health issues out there just waiting to be labelled as vaccine-induced too but those I have mentioned above are the most common baddies at the moment. The anti-vaccine advocates would have you believe that it is actually good for children to contract nasty preventable diseases because, basically, they are “non-threatening” illnesses and once the child recovers they will have a natural immunity. Ri-ight, except that “recovers” is the debatable word here.

Let’s do a whip-around of those “non-threatening” diseases, shall we? We’ll start with Measles, Mumps and Chickenpox. Yes, children have caught these and most of them recovered, but measles and chickenpox can leave pockmark scars that don’t go away. Mumps can leave boys sterile. Adults who are unfortunate enough to contract these diseases are a lot sicker than if they had had the diseases as children. Adult males who contract mumps are more highly likely to end up sterile.

Next on the list is Diphtheria. This highly contagious bacterial disease attacks and causes inflammation of the mucus membranes. It also causes the formation of false membranes in the throat, which seriously hinders breathing and swallowing, as well as potentially fatal heart and nerve damage via the bacterial toxins in the bloodstream. Tetanus is another bacterial nasty which causes severe and painful spasms and rigidity of the voluntary muscles and locks the jaw. There is no cure. Tuberculosis (TB, Consumption) is a bacterial infection that especially infects the lungs. Symptoms are fever, coughing fits that get more severe as the disease progresses and death is usually caused by eventual haemorrhage. The most common form, Pulmonary Tuberculosis, has caused millions of deaths. And let’s not forget Poliomyelitis (Polio). This infectious viral disease attacks the central nervous system, causing paralysis. Those making a recovery are left crippled. Many ended up in an iron lung, a big metal device which provided prolonged artificial respiration. Before vaccination, hospitals had a lot of these.  And then there’s Whooping Cough, a highly contagious bacterial disease characterised by compulsive coughing. Also know as Pertussis, it is usually fatal in babies and toddlers. Seriously, who would do nothing to prevent their child catching one of these when the means to prevention is readily available???

The advent of vaccination means these diseases have, thankfully, all but disappeared in developed countries. The bacteria that causes them is still present in our world but the controlled dose of lab-grown versions of them means we can be safely “infected” but not catch the disease, let alone die from it! But vaccination is most effective when everyone gets it and that’s where those refusing to vaccinate their children are causing so much damage. A vaccinated child coming into close proximity with an unvaccinated one who is sick can still contract the disease and can then pass it on to others, like babies not yet old enough to have begun the vaccination program, those with other health issues and the aged and it is often fatal for them.

In an extreme effort to promote non-vaccination, anti-vaccers have propagated a rabid campaign of misinformation which has caused a lot of confusion for some parents who naturally want to do the best by their children. This is very unfair. Interestingly, many of the anti-vaccination supporters soon lost their fervour when the Australian Government imposed welfare cuts and the non-payment of other government assistance to those refusing to vaccinate their children. Funny that! But with the reintroduction of many of these nasty but preventable diseases, due to a stubborn and misguided group of individuals opting out of vaccinating, some hefty action needed to be taken  and withholding the government handouts these people enjoy was probably one of the most effective actions it could have taken.

Because money talks.

0
comments

Oct 13

The Gender Thingy

Gender issues have been all over the media a lot lately, haven’t they? What with LGBTI, gender fluidity (what exactly is that anyway?), the Same Sex Marriage debate and the contentious Safe Schools program, you could not be blamed for fessing up to being genuinely confused about the whole thing.

But let’s start with the basics. Just about everything on the planet is either male or female. Nature dictated this so that species could breed, be they plant or animal and sexual orientation forms in the womb and that’s that. Generally speaking, that orientation means an attraction to the opposite sex but sometimes it orientates toward same sex. Nothing wrong with that. Still with me? Okay, good.

Anyway, still generally speaking, primary school-aged children tend to avoid their opposite sex classmates on the whole because, well, they each think the other really gross when they are that age! This phase only lasts though until the hormones kick in and they begin to see each other in a whole new light. This would probably be the same deal for those attracted to their own sex. But as I said, orientation begins in the womb and while little kids aren’t necessarily consciously aware of which way their attraction goes, subconsciously they are.

Right, but the trend at the moment appears to be getting started on little kids early and “educating” them about gender thingies that they would barely understand because they are just too young to really grasp the complex issues of sexual orientation. Let’s face it, they are just too young to fully grasp sex, full stop! Hence the brouhaha over the Safe Schools program that was packaged as an anti-bullying campaign when it really wasn’t about that at all.

Anyway, there seems to be a big a focus on prompting primary schoolers to think too much about which way they lean, with a big emphasis on LGBTI and that’s probably not a great idea with kids of that age. Inherently they probably know their own leanings , even if they are not overtly conscious of them, so do they really need to be influenced (pushed) toward what’s currently on trend? Has anyone ever thought to ask a primary schooler what LGBTI and/or a same sex relationship actually is? Kids being kids, they probably have a completely different interpretation of what it’s all about and the social engineers driving the program have no idea! No surprises there.

But let’s face it, kids are easily influenced. I went to a Catholic primary school and in Year 2 every little girl in my class (me included) decided we wanted to be nuns when we grew up. All, that is, except the one who was double-jointed in almost every joint in her body (we were so jealous) who wanted to be an acrobat. Either that or a famous actress who would star as an acrobat in movies about circuses (yes, I know, but we were only seven at the time) and one other who was hell bent on being an air hostess, as they were called at the time. But the rest of us were going to be nuns because we liked our nuns at school. They were wonderfully mysterious and about as holy as one could get! What was not to love? The reality, of course, was that none of us would end up running off to join the convent but at the time we were surrounded by nuns and were unwittingly influenced and that was without any pressure or programs to get us into the mindset.

But today there are books and programs geared towards getting young children to identify with their sexuality and if they can be coerced into identifying with something other than heterosexual they are celebrated. That’s enough to get any little one’s attention! I suspect the push toward getting female school children out of uniforms that are dresses and into long pants and shorts might be connected, even if the powers that be deny it till they’re blue in the face!

Certainly, teaching tolerance of others at an early age is a good thing and a child leaning towards an LGBTI identity should be able to feel safe at school and comfortable with who they are, but does that mean all their little classmates have to follow the same orientation? It doesn’t, but the program doesn’t seem to recognise that obviously heterosexual kids have the right to feel comfortable in their own skin too, and that’s what has rubbed so many people the wrong way, who are then wrongly labelled as homophobic or something.

Primary schoolers really don’t need the hassle of having to tackle complex sexual issues that they are still years away from really understanding, so please stop!

It’s messing with their little heads.

0
comments

Oct 06

The “M” Word

Buzz words have become a bit of a thing, haven’t they? Some even find their way into the dictionary eventually, but while “marriage” has never really attracted buzz word status, if prefixed with “same sex” you get the the buzz word of the moment; same sex marriage.

Okay, fine, so that’s three words (buzz phrase maybe…?) but those three words have been dominating the media in Australia for quite a while, with the promise of a plebiscite being followed by a non-compulsory postal vote that won’t necessarily have any impact on changing the current Marriage Act, which would allow same sex couples to marry.

Confused? Me too, but the nation appears to have split into two very distinct groups regarding this matter and both are steadfastly defending their right to their opinion and how they intend to vote.

On one side of the fence are those in favour of same sex couples having the right to legally marry, granting them the same rights as opposite sex couples. The “Yes” voters really want this, hence the lengths they have gone to in the hope of convincing the rest of the nation to vote with them, hence the barrage of text messages to mobile phones, the Facebook posts, the protest marches, door knocks and a whole lot of other vocal shenanigans to put the “Yes” vote perspective out there. Fine, that’s all well and good, right?

Except with those on the other side of the fence. That’s where the “No” voters are holding fort and they are just as passionate in their opposition to changes to the Marriage Act as the “Yes” voters are for it. They just haven’t been as noisy or demonstrative about it.

The “No” voters oppose changing the Marriage Act to allow same sex couples to marry because they believe it will cause a domino effect which will open the door to other changes within society that they aren’t comfortable with. They are predicting further complications, like someone using the changes to the Act to attempt to marry their cat or their goldfish or the stunning frangipani tree in their backyard. Admittedly, people wanting to marry something other than another person would have to be in the minority but if that passion for the frangipani burns hot enough, all they’d need is a smarty pants lawyer who can find a loophole blindfolded and with one hand tied behind his back! And that’s one of the biggest issues with the “No” voters; the smarty pants, loophole-finding lawyer!

Oh, and the rainbows. Once a popular non-political thingy, the rainbow now appears to be monopolised by the “Yes” campaign. Actually it has been a symbol of homosexual pride for a while now but I see where the “No” group is coming from here. Once just a pretty decorative element on clothing, rear window and bumper stickers, and anything vaguely to do with the hippy scene, it has now become somewhat of a political statement. The “No” crowd really object to the rainbow being used in that way and they want it back.

But meanwhile, where are the pollies in all of this? Well, you’ll find them perched precariously atop the fence separating the “No” voters from the “Yes” voters and waiting to see who gets the greatest number of votes and then side with them accordingly. But I think the truth is that none of our pollies want to go down in history as being the guy who changed the Marriage Act! Especially if it does open the door to further issues that blur the lines of that to which society has become comfortably accustomed. There will be sufficient “No” supporters out there to say “Ah ha! We told you so!” And then they will not vote for the guy that changed the Act which will probably mean he can kiss his political career goodbye. He won’t like that. Unless, of course, there is an overwhelming number of “Yes” votes which will guarantee his political position is as safe as houses. But remember, an overwhelming “Yes” vote via the postal vote does not guarantee the Marriage Act will change in the foreseeable future…

Plans to wed the frangipani might have to go on hold.

 

0
comments

Feb 13

All work and No Play…

It’s an old expression, “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy” but it is still very relevant today and something that many parents seem to have forgotten in the race to ensure their offspring is smarter than everyone else’s.

Well we would all like to think we have bred little geniuses, but the truth is that not many of us do. Sure, some kids are naturally brighter than others and while it’s nice to encourage them, the thing is that bright kids will shine all on their own if left to their own devices, but the average ones are going to really struggle if pushed to achieve beyond what they are capable of. There’s nothing wrong with being average though. Or “age level” as some like to put it today. The kiddie operating on an average age scale can do well in school and go on to a good career in adulthood and parents of average little achievers should not feel let down by that because there’s nothing wrong with it.

But we are in an age where smarts are In and average is Out, hence educational programs aimed at toddlers to make them “ready for school”. How unfair on the toddler, not to mention potentially damaging. Little kids like to play and that’s a good thing!. Play is a wonderful learning tool as it allows children to develop social skills, problem-solving skills, creative skills, plus a myriad of others and the beauty of it is they have such a great time learning and developing them.  Play also gets them off the couch and on the move which is also important for fitness and the development of fine and major motor skills and to build confidence in their physical capabilities. That’s how important unrestricted, non-organised play is.

What’s not important is whether or not they have an “appreciation” of classical music, contemporary (Oh how I loathe that word!) dance/drama, can read, play several instruments, are trending Shakespeare or commenting on political issues by the age of three.  There is absolutely nothing wrong with average, age appropriate intelligence but too many parents are pressuring their young children into activities that just aren’t suitable or appealing to their age, micromanaging every moment of their young lives in an effort to make them, or at least make them appear to be, uber smart. It doesn’t work. Children with average smarts can improve on their academic levels via study and an interest in what they are doing but those things will not a little genius make. It will go a long way toward helping them pass their exams though, so a little encouragement in the study department is not a bad thing. But when it’s all said and done, geniuses/super smart kids are born, not made and if they do fall into the super smart category, they don’t need you to organise their lives for them as they are quite capable of doing that themselves, which they usually do!

So why don’t pushy parents get this? Personally, I think it is more about the parents being able to talk about their children’s achievements than any genuine desire just to see their kids to well for their own sake. Kids are individuals who develop at their own pace and when allowed to do that, the result is generally a happy child who grows into a well-balanced adult. The problems start when parents are hell-bent on their child being brilliant. They have to qualify for the best schools, the gifted and talented class, musically, in literature, etc, etc, etc! The average child pushed beyond their limits often ends up either stressed out all the time or just plain lifeless. Dull,in other words. The kiddie slightly above average becomes obnoxious from all the “positive reinforcement” until they crash under the pressure of being in a gifted and talented class that they can’t keep up with. The genuine little geniuses, however, are very good at tuning out over-achieving parents and just go their own way anyway so why waste the energy?

Preschoolers don’t need early academic education. They don’t need to be able to read, write and do maths before they start kindergarten. they certainly don’t need to be dragged to activities that probably have them mentally climbing the walls because they are bored beyond reason by “drama appreciation” and “music interpretation”. They are little kids.

Just let them play.

 

0
comments

Feb 05

What’s with the step-counting apps???

Well to be perfectly honest, probably nothing. I don’t see the sense of something that counts how many steps we have taken in a single walk from A to B, so of all the apps being pushed on us as a great idea, this one just isn’t.  Sure, I get that fitness is still big business and those who can manage to cash in on it will do so via useless items like calorie counters, lycra, activewear and little bracelets and/or phone apps that count how many steps you take in a single day. I mean, how often do you really don that lycra outfit you spent a lot on? Or actually use that calorie counter? Chances are that a week or so after dashing out to buy it, it has found a spot in the back of the wardrobe/cupboard and remained there ever since. It happens. It’s all gung-ho and then…nothing, until you rediscover it and sell it for a tenth of the purchase price on eBay.

So why splurge on some gadget that is going to count your steps all day? Okay, so you walk to work, take the stairs to your floor/office, at lunchtime walk to that earthy cafe for a macro salad and a lite decaf, walk back to work and then walk home. You know you have done a reasonable amount of walking, right? You’re happy about that, yeah? So isn’t that all that matters? You made a conscious decision to walk. End of story. Are you really going to get all excited by a step reading? Okay, so you are. That could almost be a bit pedantic. What possible rush could you get out of knowing to the last footfall how many steps you take in a single day?

But step-counting gadgets are literally walking out the door because many of us have been hyped into thinking we need them and the retailers and the manufacturers are laughing all the way to the bank. Possibly on foot but I bet they’re not! Meanwhile another person on a fitness fix has bought one of the bracelets or apps to tell them that their power walk to the shop, around the block or wherever has upped their step-count and burned X amount of calories. But you can guess that on your own, surely. As in, walk instead of transport equals good for you and it stands to reason that you would have burned up calories and a few fat cells into the bargain. Shouldn’t that be all you need to know?  You got off the couch and got yourself into motion and it did your body a whole heap of good.  Your mind too for that matter. You don’t need to know how many steps you took to achieve that.

Forget the apps, just do it!

 

0
comments

Jan 16

The Lost Art of Common Sense

It used to be one of our life skills once upon a time, but for the last few years or so I’ve come to the conclusion that much of the population wouldn’t know common sense if they fell over it. I think it may have been shunted out the door when the age of entitlement, along with the concept that people are no longer responsible for their own actions, got a foothold because for the last decade or so it has become the norm to blame everything else for one’s own stupidity and, coupled with the Nanny State mentality on the loose throughout the various community organisations and minor government wannabes, we have a growing population of people sitting back and waiting for someone else to fix their lives for them.

Take obesity.  The bottom line here is that if you and/or your offspring are unhealthily overweight, it is actually your own fault. It is not the supermarkets’ fault. Nor is it the fault of the various fast food outlets or television advertising. It’s not even the government’s fault! It is yours. You see, common sense would have told you (and probably did but you chose to ignore it) that a steady diet of burgers, chips, soft drink, fried chicken, alcohol, confectionary, pizzas and general laziness was not good for you or your kids and would probably result in you all becoming morbidly obese. It is not, then, up to the government or any other organisation to fix that for you, yet taxpayers are funding things like star ratings on food and other programs designed to educate you about good diets and healthier eating. Why is that? Once upon a time people knew the deal and lived accordingly.

Illegal drugs. So despite all the information out there on how harmful and addictive they are you still opted to try them all and start using regularly. Then you got hooked. You have since committed various offences while under the influence of your drug of choice or in order to get the money to pay for your next fix and now you’re in trouble up to your eyeballs because the offences are nasty ones. This is actually your own fault. Why? Because you ignored the warnings that common sense definitely told you were worth heeding.  Therefore, why should anyone be expected to come up with excuses for you or be able to blame your addiction for your crime spree? You knew these things were bad news yet you still chose to use. Why shouldn’t you go to gaol instead of receiving another good behaviour bond (to add to the long list of bonds you’re already been granted)?

Sense of entitlement and instant gratification. Just because these are alive and well in today’s society doesn’t mean they are good for you or your children. In fact, they are even worse for children because they encourage then to grow up into selfish, pedantic adults who believe that everything still revolves around them and they can get downright nasty if someone contradicts that mindset.

Homeless kids. In the majority of cases they aren’t. They have perfectly good homes with great parents but they object to the restrictions imposed to keep them safe and because the social security services start handing them money from the age of 16, which increases if they are not living at home, they take off. Then impart a farcial tale of woe to whoever will listen. Common sense should have made it very clear to the particular government that introduced youth allowance that it was a bad idea but apparently it didn’t. Before youth allowance payments, kids either stayed at school or left and found work, then continued to live at home until they could fund their own life. Hopefully, common sense will tell the parents of feral kids who nick off to live in dives on welfare, that giving them money to prop up their dubious lifestyle is a bad idea. It just sets a precedent. Better to let them learn what it really means to live independently, things like budgeting and living within their means. They will only do that when you stop giving them money.

Expensive gadgetry for preschoolers. The three-year-old has an iPad and an iPhone. Are you *&$#@)! crazy??! For goodness sake! Where is your common sense? Oh that’s right, no one seems to know what that is anymore.

Makes no sense to me at all.

 

 

 

 

 

0
comments

May 29

O D-ing on vitamin sups

The vitamin and supplement industry is a biggie, isn’t it? Like, you name it and you’ll find it on a supermarket or health food store shelf and if you believe all the advertising supporting them, you’ll already be convinced that you need them. Well chances are, you don’t.

Generally speaking, if you are eating the right balance of fruits, vegetables, nuts, fish and meats with some full cream dairy products thrown in, you will have no need of vitamin or mineral supplements because you will be getting the recommended daily intake from your food. This is really good, yeah? Well of course it is! Vitamin and mineral intake via the foods we eat is the best way to ingest them because they are in their most natural form and that is definitely good. Toss an egg or two into the daily mix and you’ll have it down pat! Seriously, that’s how easy it is.

Or you can open a bottle and toss some of the contents down your throat. That’s easy too, but is it the best solution? The sups on the shop shelves though are not all that natural and according to a recent study, possibly not all that reliable either because the study found that a surprising number of them didn’t contain what they said they did. However, of the ones that did, the amount per day that you would be ingesting should you follow the recommended dosage on the bottle/packet could lead you to overdosing. Now that may not sound all that bad because vitamins and minerals are good for us, right? Yes they are but remember that little warning about too much of a good thing? Good, because taking too much of them is definitely bad for you. The same goes for antioxidants. In the right form and at the right levels they are very useful but overdoing it negates the benefits.

So how do you know if you need to use supplements? Well, if you diet consists of meat, meat and more meat but without the salad or the veggies on the side you can pretty much guarantee that you’ll be missing out on just about every vitamin and mineral known to man. Ditto if your dietary intake doesn’t go past the confectionery aisle. Or your local fast food outlet. If this is you, then it’s a given you are denying your body the things it needs to keep you fit and healthy but now that you know that (and you do because I’ve just told you so!) there is something you can do to counter the lack.

You can a) change your diet to include the foods you need to keep your vitamin/mineral levels up to speed, or b) stuff yourself full of powders, pills and other supplements to counter the damage of the lousy diet. So…will it be fruit and veg or cupboard full of bottles? The fresh stuff will cost you a lot less and you’ll be getting the goodies naturally and even better, one can’t overdose on fresh fruit and veg, no matter how much we consume, as opposed to way to many vitamin and mineral pills and liquids. Way Too Many! You should think about that. Ditto using a lack of culinary skills as an excuse. Anyone can learn to cook and that includes you and your health and lifestyle will definitely benefit from your efforts.

It’s really easy when you know how.

 

 

0
comments

Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.